Amendment 10 — part 1, after paragraph 25
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024
A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 10/1
Adopted
- For
- 513
- Against
- 110
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 14:18 · 79% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘its warning’, ‘or objectives’, ‘EU financial interests to already determined risks; believes that the spirit of the Conditionality Regulation precludes’, ‘and therefore urges the Commission to reject any requests for transfer’, ‘that would lead to a circumvention of measures under the Conditionality Regulation’, and ‘not follow, the Commission decision’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 1 | 0 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 70 | 0 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 165 | 0 | 1 | 166 | For |
| ECR | 3 | 68 | 1 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 55 | 7 | 14 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 23 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 11 | 8 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
76 MEPs of 647 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.