Amendment 9 — part 1, after paragraph 25
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024
A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 9/1
Adopted
- For
- 532
- Against
- 89
- Abstained
- 29
roll-call vote at 14:17 · 82% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘measures adopted in accordance with Article 6 of the Financial Regulation, and pending conditionality screenings, so that the Member States cannot exploit procedural silos and’ and ‘regardless of the legal instrument used’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 1 | 0 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 0 | 0 | 125 | For |
| Renew | 70 | 0 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 163 | 1 | 1 | 165 | For |
| ECR | 9 | 48 | 17 | 74 | Divided |
| Patriots | 67 | 7 | 3 | 77 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 21 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 11 | 6 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
74 MEPs of 650 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.