Paragraph 4 — part 2
Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2
Rejected
- For
- 250
- Against
- 310
- Abstained
- 16
roll-call vote at 12:26 · 43% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members
The part voted on: those words
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| S&D | 110 | 0 | 0 | 110 | For |
| Renew | 32 | 25 | 4 | 61 | Divided |
| EPP | 13 | 131 | 0 | 144 | Against |
| ECR | 2 | 56 | 4 | 62 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 67 | 1 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 7 | 6 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 576 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.