Recital P — part 2
Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania
RC-B10-0070/2026 – Recital P/2
Adopted
- For
- 426
- Against
- 141
- Abstained
- 42
roll-call vote at 12:20 · 70% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by S&D
The part voted on: ‘and explicitly indicating an intention to enable her removal from office; whereas legislation targeting a specific individual (<i>ad personam</i> legislation) is incompatible with the principles of the rule of law, including legal certainty, the generality of laws and the prohibition of the arbitrary exercise of power;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 0 | 0 | 108 | For |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 0 | 62 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 1 | 0 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 62 | 1 | 63 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 66 | 12 | 78 | Against |
| ESN | 2 | 6 | 17 | 25 | Abstained |
| No group | 7 | 6 | 12 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 609 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.