Amendment 16, after paragraph 49
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 49 – Am 16
Rejected
- For
- 170
- Against
- 386
- Abstained
- 28
roll-call vote at 12:14 · 29% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 2 | 41 | 0 | 43 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 102 | 0 | 102 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 59 | 0 | 60 | Against |
| EPP | 4 | 137 | 8 | 149 | Against |
| ECR | 48 | 6 | 15 | 69 | For |
| Patriots | 75 | 0 | 1 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 17 | 4 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 584 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.