Amendment 9, after paragraph 9
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 9 – Am 9
Rejected
- For
- 184
- Against
- 392
- Abstained
- 2
roll-call vote at 12:09 · 32% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 43 | 0 | 43 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 103 | 0 | 103 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 | Against |
| EPP | 5 | 138 | 2 | 145 | Against |
| ECR | 64 | 4 | 0 | 68 | For |
| Patriots | 76 | 0 | 0 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 16 | 8 | 0 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
23 MEPs of 578 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.