Paragraph 7 — part 1
Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania
RC-B10-0571/2025 – § 7/1
Adopted
- For
- 451
- Against
- 43
- Abstained
- 65
roll-call vote at 12:21 · 81% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘particularly those posed by its state-engineered instrumentalisation of migration’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 13 | 2 | 21 | 36 | Divided |
| Greens | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| S&D | 97 | 0 | 0 | 97 | For |
| Renew | 58 | 0 | 0 | 58 | For |
| EPP | 148 | 0 | 0 | 148 | For |
| ECR | 60 | 3 | 3 | 66 | For |
| Patriots | 28 | 6 | 32 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 17 | 5 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 15 | 4 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 559 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.