Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2
EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic
A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/2
Adopted
- For
- 481
- Against
- 113
- Abstained
- 67
roll-call vote at 12:33 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘with that in mind, considering that Norway’s EU membership would strengthen both its national interests and the EU’s geopolitical resilience by closing critical gaps in the latter’s collective defence – notably in the GIUK gap’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 6 | 18 | 15 | 39 | Divided |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 127 | 0 | 0 | 127 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 1 | 1 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 169 | 0 | 6 | 175 | For |
| ECR | 41 | 4 | 29 | 74 | Divided |
| Patriots | 17 | 58 | 6 | 81 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 18 | 3 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 6 | 14 | 7 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
74 MEPs of 661 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.