Referral back to committee
Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
Adopted
- For
- 426
- Against
- 202
- Abstained
- 8
roll-call vote at 11:51 · 67% of votes cast in favour
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 14 | 109 | 0 | 123 | Against |
| Renew | 61 | 1 | 1 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 170 | 1 | 0 | 171 | For |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 76 | 0 | 0 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 1 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 12 | 4 | 7 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
123 MEPs of 636 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.