Amendment 212 to article 4
Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 12 – point c; Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point d – Am 212S
Rejected
- For
- 209
- Against
- 422
- Abstained
- 6
roll-call vote at 11:42 · 33% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 116 | 1 | 1 | 118 | For |
| Renew | 1 | 62 | 0 | 63 | Against |
| EPP | 2 | 170 | 1 | 173 | Against |
| ECR | 1 | 71 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 77 | 0 | 77 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 3 | 18 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 637 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.