Amendment 264 to article 3
Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 3 – § 1 – point 2 – point b – point ii; Article 5 – paragraph 2 – § 3 – point b – point ii – Am 264
Rejected
- For
- 181
- Against
- 461
- Abstained
- 3
roll-call vote at 11:24 · 28% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens, ESN
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 | Against |
| Renew | 2 | 62 | 0 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 173 | 0 | 173 | Against |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 77 | 0 | 0 | 77 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 1 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 7 | 15 | 3 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 645 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.