Amendment 45 — part 1 to article 2
Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 2 – § 1 – point 4 – point b – after point i; Article 29a – paragraph 3 – § 2 – Am 45/1
Adopted
- For
- 496
- Against
- 138
- Abstained
- 13
roll-call vote at 11:16 · 77% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘(i a) the second subparagraph is replaced by the following: “In the event that not all the necessary information regarding its value chain is available, the undertaking shall explain the efforts made to obtain the necessary information about its value chain, the reasons why not all of the necessary information could be obtained, and its plans to obtain the necessary information in the future.’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 1 | 0 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 173 | 0 | 0 | 173 | For |
| ECR | 72 | 1 | 1 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 2 | 68 | 7 | 77 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 1 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 15 | 6 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 647 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.