Paragraph 67 — part 1
Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan
B10-0450/2025 – § 67/1
Adopted
- For
- 473
- Against
- 51
- Abstained
- 43
roll-call vote at 13:27 · 83% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘which in its gravest form should be recognised as ecocide’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 33 | 0 | 1 | 34 | For |
| Greens | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| S&D | 104 | 1 | 0 | 105 | For |
| Renew | 60 | 3 | 0 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 134 | 8 | 5 | 147 | For |
| ECR | 55 | 0 | 6 | 61 | For |
| Patriots | 28 | 31 | 7 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 3 | 18 | 22 | Abstained |
| No group | 15 | 5 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 567 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.