Paragraph 54 — part 2
Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan
B10-0450/2025 – § 54/2
Adopted
- For
- 374
- Against
- 122
- Abstained
- 68
roll-call vote at 13:27 · 66% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to swiftly propose an EU-wide positive list of animals allowed to be kept or traded as pets, based on recommendations from the study on the necessity, added value and feasibility of such a list, while taking into account scientific risk assessments and ecological criteria;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 33 | 0 | 1 | 34 | For |
| Greens | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| S&D | 104 | 0 | 0 | 104 | For |
| Renew | 58 | 0 | 4 | 62 | For |
| EPP | 125 | 2 | 18 | 145 | For |
| ECR | 2 | 51 | 8 | 61 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 38 | 27 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 9 | 10 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 564 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.