Paragraph 54 — part 1
Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan
B10-0450/2025 – § 54/1
Adopted
- For
- 456
- Against
- 68
- Abstained
- 44
roll-call vote at 13:26 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘Emphasises that the absence of a common EU framework for welfare provisions on the breeding, keeping and placing on the market of pet animal species other than dogs and cats, along with divergent national rules, leads to inconsistencies, gaps in enforcement, confusion for consumers and, often, serious animal welfare consequences for species that are unsuitable to be kept as pets, as well as risks to biodiversity, human health and safety, and nature conservation;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 32 | 0 | 0 | 32 | For |
| Greens | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| S&D | 105 | 0 | 0 | 105 | For |
| Renew | 60 | 0 | 3 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 143 | 1 | 3 | 147 | For |
| ECR | 53 | 4 | 5 | 62 | For |
| Patriots | 1 | 39 | 27 | 67 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 20 | 1 | 22 | Against |
| No group | 17 | 4 | 5 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
67 MEPs of 568 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.