Paragraph 78 — part 2
UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)
B10-0445/2025 – § 78/2
Adopted
- For
- 337
- Against
- 218
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 13:21 · 59% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘stresses the importance of further measures to support the electrification of road transport as a way of reducing road transport emissions, in conjunction with further measures supporting the modal shift, intermodal transport and public transport in general; calls on the Commission to include emissions from international transport in NDCs; is concerned by the fact that the Commission’s 2025 NECP assessment report showed that some Member States still have support schemes for fossil-fuel powered vehicles and calls on those Member States to phase them out;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 34 | 0 | 0 | 34 | For |
| Greens | 44 | 1 | 0 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 104 | 1 | 0 | 105 | For |
| Renew | 54 | 5 | 4 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 84 | 57 | 5 | 146 | Divided |
| ECR | 0 | 64 | 0 | 64 | Against |
| Patriots | 2 | 65 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| ESN | 11 | 12 | 0 | 23 | Divided |
| No group | 4 | 13 | 9 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
67 MEPs of 573 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.