Paragraph 4 — part 5
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/5
Adopted
- For
- 344
- Against
- 227
- Abstained
- 45
roll-call vote at 15:00 · 56% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘takes note of the cumbersome and outdated structure and governance of the EU budget and the possible redistribution in the allocation of agricultural and cohesion funds; recalls that EU enlargement is an opportunity to recalibrate key EU policies in this respect;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 4 | 24 | 12 | 40 | Divided |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 94 | 7 | 6 | 107 | For |
| Renew | 58 | 7 | 5 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 129 | 22 | 10 | 161 | For |
| ECR | 5 | 58 | 0 | 63 | Against |
| Patriots | 3 | 67 | 10 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 19 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
40 MEPs of 616 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.