Paragraph 4 — part 4
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/4
Adopted
- For
- 326
- Against
- 272
- Abstained
- 29
roll-call vote at 15:00 · 52% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘recalls that Article 49 TEU enables a move to QMV without requiring Treaty changes;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 4 | 20 | 11 | 35 | Divided |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 97 | 6 | 7 | 110 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 7 | 0 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 110 | 52 | 4 | 166 | Divided |
| ECR | 1 | 63 | 3 | 67 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 2 | 21 | 4 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
35 MEPs of 627 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.