Paragraph 4 — part 3
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/3
Adopted
- For
- 321
- Against
- 270
- Abstained
- 47
roll-call vote at 15:00 · 50% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘underlines the importance of addressing the difficulties caused by unanimity in the Council, including the use of unanimity for intermediate steps in the enlargement process, which could slow down the EU accession of new members owing to bilateral issues;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 8 | 20 | 13 | 41 | Divided |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 100 | 11 | 5 | 116 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 6 | 1 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 94 | 48 | 26 | 168 | Divided |
| ECR | 3 | 62 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 3 | 22 | 2 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
71 MEPs of 638 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.