Paragraph 4 — part 2
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/2
Adopted
- For
- 411
- Against
- 169
- Abstained
- 63
roll-call vote at 14:59 · 64% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘believes, however, that an enlarged EU will require more sophisticated coordination in addressing the challenges of the current enlargement process;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 34 | 3 | 2 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 110 | 2 | 4 | 116 | For |
| Renew | 71 | 1 | 0 | 72 | For |
| EPP | 133 | 33 | 4 | 170 | For |
| ECR | 4 | 11 | 52 | 67 | Abstained |
| Patriots | 1 | 79 | 0 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 9 | 17 | 1 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
67 MEPs of 643 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.