Amendment 145 — part 1, after paragraph 67
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – After § 67 – Am 145/1
Rejected
- For
- 224
- Against
- 418
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 14:47 · 35% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots, S&D, Greens · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Underlines that appropriations for the Southern Neighbourhood line need to support efforts to tackle illegal migration, notably by enhancing border protection and facilitating return and readmission; stresses that Union funds must be conditional upon effective cooperation on migration management and return; recalls that Union funding must only be implemented by partners that ensure full transparency, neutrality and accountability;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 3 | 111 | 3 | 117 | Against |
| Renew | 7 | 65 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| EPP | 23 | 145 | 0 | 168 | Against |
| ECR | 68 | 2 | 0 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 80 | 0 | 0 | 80 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 1 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 21 | 4 | 2 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
49 MEPs of 647 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.