Recital Q — part 2
Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections
RC-B10-0451/2025 – Recital Q/2
Adopted
- For
- 476
- Against
- 42
- Abstained
- 65
roll-call vote at 15:08 · 82% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘whereas a new draft law proposes imprisonment for sharing information on LGBTQ+ issues, childlessness or ‘recognising paedophilia as acceptable’, posing a serious risk of mass censorship and harassment; whereas including paedophilia in the same list as LGBTQ+ and childlessness is a deliberate manipulation;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 1 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 0 | 1 | 109 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 132 | 1 | 12 | 145 | For |
| ECR | 12 | 26 | 23 | 61 | Divided |
| Patriots | 54 | 3 | 7 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 7 | 12 | 20 | Divided |
| No group | 12 | 4 | 10 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 583 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.