Paragraph 4 — part 1
Second World Summit for Social Development
B10-0408/2025 – § 4/1
Adopted
- For
- 478
- Against
- 69
- Abstained
- 65
roll-call vote at 13:29 · 78% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP, ECR
The part voted on: ‘Stresses the importance of using the Social Scoreboard and the Social Convergence Framework to identify risks and to track progress towards achieving upward social convergence, reducing inequalities, strengthening social protection systems and promoting decent working conditions and supportive measures to ensure fairness in the transitions; stresses that, in this regard, it is necessary to ensure a sustainable, socially just and inclusive Europe where social rights are fully protected and safeguarded; recalls that EU citizens identify a social Europe as one of their priorities;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 99 | 0 | 0 | 99 | For |
| Renew | 52 | 9 | 0 | 61 | For |
| EPP | 172 | 0 | 0 | 172 | For |
| ECR | 51 | 12 | 3 | 66 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 20 | 58 | 78 | Abstained |
| ESN | 1 | 23 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 5 | 3 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 612 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.