Amendments 81 + 86 (voted as one) to annex I
Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties
A10-0164/2025 – André Rodrigues – Annex I – point 3 – point b; Regulation (EU) 2021/2115; Annex III – GAEC 4 – footnote '*' – paragraph 3 – Am 81= 86=
Rejected
- For
- 192
- Against
- 411
- Abstained
- 36
roll-call vote at 13:43 · 30% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 15 | 0 | 21 | 36 | Divided |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 91 | 22 | 0 | 113 | For |
| Renew | 25 | 40 | 2 | 67 | Divided |
| EPP | 2 | 165 | 6 | 173 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 78 | 0 | 78 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 23 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 11 | 7 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 639 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.