Paragraph 63 — part 1
Public procurement
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 63/1
Adopted
- For
- 626
- Against
- 20
- Abstained
- 6
roll-call vote at 14:01 · 96% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Underlines, in the light of CJEU case-law (including Case C-395/18), that contracting authorities are entitled to include requirements based on national labour law in procurement documentation,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 0 | 0 | 125 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| EPP | 174 | 0 | 0 | 174 | For |
| ECR | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| Patriots | 82 | 0 | 0 | 82 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 19 | 3 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 24 | 1 | 3 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 652 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.