Amendment 397 to article 3, paragraph 1, point 9
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, point 9 - Am 397
Rejected
- For
- 158
- Against
- 471
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:41 · 24% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots, S&D
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 34 | 0 | 34 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 125 | 0 | 125 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 8 | 160 | 6 | 174 | Against |
| ECR | 28 | 33 | 5 | 66 | Divided |
| Patriots | 82 | 0 | 0 | 82 | For |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 2 | 26 | For |
| No group | 16 | 7 | 4 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
66 MEPs of 646 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.