Recital I — part 3
Security of energy supply in the EU
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital I/3
Adopted
- For
- 474
- Against
- 141
- Abstained
- 53
roll-call vote at 13:54 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘whereas EU energy efficiency policies have yielded structural results, with energy demand peaking in 2006 and declining by 20 % in 2023, highlighting energy efficiency as the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions, enhance competitiveness, make energy consumption more affordable and improve energy security;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 9 | 22 | 10 | 41 | Divided |
| Greens | 52 | 0 | 0 | 52 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 0 | 0 | 125 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 4 | 0 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 0 | 5 | 166 | For |
| ECR | 46 | 6 | 24 | 76 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 70 | 10 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 12 | 13 | 4 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
29 MEPs of 668 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.