Paragraph 49 — part 1
Security of energy supply in the EU
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 49/1
Adopted
- For
- 529
- Against
- 106
- Abstained
- 32
roll-call vote at 13:52 · 79% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘Highlights that energy efficiency plays a critical role in enhancing the security of energy supply by reducing overall energy demand, lowering dependency on energy imports and increasing system resilience; considers that the new security of supply framework should be broadened to reflect a new way of looking at the security of energy supply, based not only on energy sources, but also on the energy efficiency first principle, energy savings, cost efficiency, as well as the ability to produce different types of energy domestically;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 52 | 0 | 0 | 52 | For |
| S&D | 124 | 2 | 0 | 126 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 5 | 0 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 167 | 0 | 0 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 65 | 4 | 6 | 75 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 79 | 0 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 3 | 22 | 26 | Abstained |
| No group | 11 | 13 | 4 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
79 MEPs of 667 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.