Paragraph 7 — part 3
Security of energy supply in the EU
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/3
Adopted
- For
- 481
- Against
- 115
- Abstained
- 71
roll-call vote at 13:51 · 72% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘non-fossil’ and ‘in a transition period; draws attention to the important role that the optimal use of high-efficiency cogeneration, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive, can play in contributing to balancing the electricity grid and to the competitiveness of some industrial sectors, especially those that do not have alternative ways of producing affordable heat in their industrial processes; stresses the need to modernise and expand district heating grids to this end;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 5 | 0 | 36 | 41 | Abstained |
| Greens | 52 | 0 | 0 | 52 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 1 | 0 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 9 | 0 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 165 | 2 | 0 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 61 | 5 | 10 | 76 | For |
| Patriots | 6 | 64 | 11 | 81 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 6 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 14 | 8 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
73 MEPs of 667 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.