Amendment 4, after recital A
The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After recital A – Am 4
Rejected
- For
- 217
- Against
- 428
- Abstained
- 4
roll-call vote at 13:24 · 33% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D, Members
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 38 | 2 | 41 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 122 | 0 | 122 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 18 | 148 | 0 | 166 | Against |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 78 | 0 | 0 | 78 | For |
| ESN | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | For |
| No group | 20 | 4 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
73 MEPs of 649 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.