Amendment 9, after paragraph 47
The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 47 – Am 9
Rejected
- For
- 200
- Against
- 431
- Abstained
- 14
roll-call vote at 13:20 · 31% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D, Members
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 52 | 0 | 52 | Against |
| S&D | 2 | 115 | 1 | 118 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 61 | 3 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 13 | 154 | 0 | 167 | Against |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 2 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 74 | 4 | 0 | 78 | For |
| ESN | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | For |
| No group | 12 | 4 | 8 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
118 MEPs of 645 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.