Separate vote: paragraph 69
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 69
Rejected
- For
- 291
- Against
- 356
- Abstained
- 16
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 44% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 1 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 130 | 0 | 1 | 131 | For |
| Renew | 54 | 6 | 4 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 3 | 176 | 0 | 179 | Against |
| ECR | 1 | 68 | 3 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 74 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 2 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 8 | 5 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
42 MEPs of 663 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.