Paragraph 67 — part 2
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 67/2
Adopted
- For
- 321
- Against
- 272
- Abstained
- 64
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 49% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members
The part voted on: that word
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 1 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 128 | 2 | 1 | 131 | For |
| Renew | 54 | 6 | 2 | 62 | For |
| EPP | 33 | 97 | 44 | 174 | Divided |
| ECR | 0 | 72 | 2 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 72 | 2 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 20 | 3 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 15 | 3 | 9 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 657 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.