Paragraph 67 — part 1
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 67/1
Adopted
- For
- 585
- Against
- 43
- Abstained
- 35
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 88% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the word: ‘UNWRA’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 128 | 2 | 1 | 131 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 0 | 3 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 164 | 4 | 10 | 178 | For |
| ECR | 61 | 9 | 3 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 56 | 9 | 9 | 74 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 18 | 5 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 21 | 1 | 4 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 663 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.