Paragraph 66 — part 2
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 66/2
Adopted
- For
- 327
- Against
- 250
- Abstained
- 81
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 50% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members
The part voted on: those words
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 127 | 2 | 1 | 130 | For |
| Renew | 55 | 6 | 2 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 36 | 100 | 39 | 175 | Divided |
| ECR | 1 | 71 | 2 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 46 | 28 | 74 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 21 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 15 | 4 | 7 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
74 MEPs of 658 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.