Paragraph 66 — part 1
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 66/1
Adopted
- For
- 591
- Against
- 46
- Abstained
- 32
roll-call vote at 13:54 · 88% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘long-term, sustainable funding for United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), guaranteeing’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 128 | 2 | 1 | 131 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 175 | 3 | 2 | 180 | For |
| ECR | 62 | 8 | 4 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 49 | 9 | 16 | 74 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 20 | 5 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 4 | 4 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 669 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.