Separate vote: paragraph 20
Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 20
Rejected
- For
- 281
- Against
- 361
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:52 · 42% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 127 | 3 | 0 | 130 | For |
| Renew | 46 | 15 | 2 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 0 | 175 | 2 | 177 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 71 | 3 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 66 | 7 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 15 | 6 | 6 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
42 MEPs of 663 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.