Paragraph 23 — part 2
Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
A10-0047/2025 – Dick Erixon – § 23/2
Adopted
- For
- 537
- Against
- 101
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 81% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘to enhance Luxembourg’s appeal to prospective staff through identified measures, such as higher relocation allowances, housing allowances to mitigate high rental costs for lower-grade staff and reasonably priced temporary housing for short stays to make employment in Luxembourg more attractive;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 33 | 5 | 2 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 127 | 0 | 0 | 127 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 4 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 162 | 2 | 7 | 171 | For |
| ECR | 66 | 5 | 4 | 75 | For |
| Patriots | 7 | 75 | 1 | 83 | Against |
| ESN | 18 | 2 | 0 | 20 | For |
| No group | 9 | 8 | 9 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
20 MEPs of 661 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.