Amendment 4 — part 3 to paragraph 102
Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 102 – Am 4/3
Adopted
- For
- 356
- Against
- 269
- Abstained
- 28
roll-call vote at 13:56 · 55% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: ‘but recalls that the country is still subject to high rate of corruption and fraud, demanding extra precaution to be taken and further anti-corruption measure in order to successfully reach transparency goals;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 8 | 41 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 113 | 9 | 2 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 3 | 61 | 3 | 67 | Against |
| EPP | 16 | 152 | 1 | 169 | Against |
| ECR | 65 | 5 | 5 | 75 | For |
| Patriots | 75 | 1 | 6 | 82 | For |
| ESN | 16 | 0 | 5 | 21 | For |
| No group | 19 | 0 | 6 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 653 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.