Amendment 4 — part 1 to paragraph 102
Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 102 – Am 4/1
Adopted
- For
- 509
- Against
- 66
- Abstained
- 84
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 77% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: ‘Recalls that EPPO competences extend to EU funds even when used in third countries; believes that the working arrangements with the Ukrainian competent authorities could effectively enhance the level of protection of the Union’s financial interests following the relevant commitments undertaken to support Ukraine and its population;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 1 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 1 | 0 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 70 | 0 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 169 | 0 | 1 | 170 | For |
| ECR | 16 | 59 | 0 | 75 | Against |
| Patriots | 21 | 1 | 61 | 83 | Abstained |
| ESN | 3 | 0 | 19 | 22 | Abstained |
| No group | 19 | 4 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
70 MEPs of 659 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.