Paragraph 95 — part 2
Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 95/2
Adopted
- For
- 441
- Against
- 199
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 13:55 · 67% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to closely monitor Member States’ level of cooperation with the EPPO and urges the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against any Member State that systematically obstructs EPPO-led investigations; takes the view that membership of the EPPO should be a precondition for receiving Union funds;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 1 | 2 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 0 | 1 | 126 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 154 | 9 | 6 | 169 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 73 | 2 | 76 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 82 | 0 | 83 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 1 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 6 | 14 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
68 MEPs of 658 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.