Paragraph 18 — part 3
Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 18/3
Adopted
- For
- 458
- Against
- 154
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 13:54 · 72% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘and points out that this is against the spirit of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, which provides that, in accordance with Article 267 TFEU, the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the provision on conflicts of competence between the EPPO and national authorities;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 1 | 2 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 126 | 0 | 0 | 126 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 157 | 0 | 3 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 61 | 6 | 68 | Against |
| Patriots | 7 | 64 | 11 | 82 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 21 | 1 | 22 | Against |
| No group | 16 | 7 | 1 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 636 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.