Amendment 70 — part 1, after recital R
Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024
A10-0012/2025 – Isabel Wiseler-Lima – After recital R – Am 70/1
Adopted
- For
- 551
- Against
- 55
- Abstained
- 45
roll-call vote at 14:40 · 85% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D
The part voted on: ‘whereas, according to Article 21 TEU, the Union must seek to develop relations and build partnerships with third countries based, among other principles, on democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law; whereas numerous EU partners, despite benefiting for years from various preferences and advantages stemming from agreements with the EU, fail to comply with their obligations,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 41 | 0 | 43 | Against |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 3 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 1 | 2 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 3 | 1 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 164 | 5 | 0 | 169 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 0 | 0 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 70 | 0 | 9 | 79 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 0 | 21 | 23 | Abstained |
| No group | 7 | 5 | 9 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
21 MEPs of 651 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.