Paragraph 13 — part 1
Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights
B10-0143/2025 – § 13/1
Adopted
- For
- 440
- Against
- 137
- Abstained
- 45
roll-call vote at 12:16 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Renew, EPP · separate vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘Is alarmed that European company law provisions, as well as their interpretation in some legal cases, are creating loopholes and are enabling the circumvention of mandatory national board-level participation rules;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 0 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 5 | 61 | 0 | 66 | Against |
| EPP | 137 | 16 | 4 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 4 | 53 | 6 | 63 | Against |
| Patriots | 63 | 4 | 10 | 77 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 3 | 19 | 24 | Abstained |
| No group | 20 | 0 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.