Paragraph 23 — part 1
European Central Bank – annual report 2024
A10–0003/2025 – Anouk Van Brug – § 23/1
Adopted
- For
- 509
- Against
- 113
- Abstained
- 16
roll-call vote at 12:46 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Stresses that the ECB’s purchase programmes are unconventional policies applicable only during crisis periods that, if not carefully implemented, risk contravening the prohibition on monetary financing under Article 123(1) TFEU;’ excluding the words ‘applicable only during crisis periods that, if not carefully implemented, risk’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 40 | 1 | 43 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 52 | 0 | 52 | Against |
| S&D | 114 | 1 | 0 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 1 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 168 | 1 | 0 | 169 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 2 | 0 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 64 | 8 | 7 | 79 | For |
| ESN | 19 | 1 | 0 | 20 | For |
| No group | 6 | 7 | 8 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
20 MEPs of 638 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.