Paragraph 22 — part 1
The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia
RC-B10-0070/2024 – § 22/1
Adopted
- For
- 501
- Against
- 65
- Abstained
- 95
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 76% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP, ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘Expresses deep concern about the increased influence of Russia in Georgia, including increased immigration from Russia, increased trade ties with Russia and Georgia’s willingness to pursue reconciliation with Russia’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 7 | 14 | 21 | 42 | Divided |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 3 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 0 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 75 | 0 | 1 | 76 | For |
| EPP | 166 | 0 | 1 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 67 | 1 | 5 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 13 | 10 | 57 | 80 | Abstained |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 3 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 20 | 4 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
29 MEPs of 661 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.