Paragraph 21 — part 2
The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change
RC-B10-0057/2024 – § 21/2
Adopted
- For
- 445
- Against
- 128
- Abstained
- 32
roll-call vote at 13:39 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘and nature-based solutions, and long-term investments in green and blue infrastructure, such as giving streams and rivers more space by restoring natural flood plains and old riverbeds, wetlands and forests, and improving water retention by restoring the sponge function of landscapes; calls for any potential synergies to be leveraged between the planning instruments under development by the Member States, for example, natural restoration plans, soil district plans, integrated management plans under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive and flood risk management, while avoiding maladaptation;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 107 | 0 | 1 | 108 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 1 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 144 | 1 | 6 | 151 | For |
| ECR | 4 | 60 | 5 | 69 | Against |
| Patriots | 4 | 58 | 6 | 68 | Against |
| ESN | 17 | 3 | 3 | 23 | For |
| No group | 13 | 5 | 11 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
70 MEPs of 605 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.