Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), and Rule 115(4)(c): Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl
B10-0020/2024 - Proposition de résolution
Objection passed
On the objection:
- For
- 516
- Against
- 129
- Abstained
- 27
roll-call vote at 13:18 · 77% of votes cast were for the objection
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 126 | 0 | 0 | 126 | For |
| Renew | 51 | 19 | 3 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 63 | 105 | 7 | 175 | Divided |
| ECR | 68 | 1 | 5 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 78 | 0 | 0 | 78 | For |
| ESN | 9 | 0 | 12 | 21 | Divided |
| No group | 27 | 4 | 0 | 31 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
21 MEPs of 672 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.