Amendment 92, after recital 9
Combating late payment in commercial transactions
A9-0156/2024 – Róża Thun und Hohenstein – After recital 9 – Am 92
Adopted
- For
- 437
- Against
- 139
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:47 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | For |
| Greens | 29 | 0 | 0 | 29 | For |
| S&D | 57 | 1 | 0 | 58 | For |
| Renew | 18 | 18 | 0 | 36 | Divided |
| EPP | 61 | 19 | 0 | 80 | For |
| ECR | 6 | 15 | 1 | 22 | Against |
| Patriots | 12 | 5 | 8 | 25 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
4 MEPs of 593 Clear filters
Christine Anderson Germany · ESN
Against
Ivan David Czechia · ESN
Against
Markus Buchheit Germany · ESN
Against
Milan Uhrík Slovakia · ESN
For voted against their group’s line
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.