Amendment 2, after paragraph 29
2022 discharge: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (the ‘EPPO’)
A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 29 – Am 2
Rejected
- For
- 233
- Against
- 343
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:06 · 39% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 11 | 1 | 0 | 12 | For |
| Greens | 22 | 2 | 0 | 24 | For |
| S&D | 6 | 51 | 3 | 60 | Against |
| Renew | 2 | 36 | 1 | 39 | Against |
| EPP | 6 | 73 | 1 | 80 | Against |
| ECR | 23 | 0 | 1 | 24 | For |
| Patriots | 24 | 0 | 1 | 25 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | For |
| No group | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
3 MEPs of 597 Clear filters
Katarína Roth Neveďalová Slovakia · No group
For
Kateřina Konečná Czechia · No group
For
Monika Beňová Slovakia · No group
For
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.